The media
is where the public learns about the government happenings. Going to government
sources or doing research to find information first hand is time consuming and
difficult so that is why news outlets are used because of accessibility and
timeliness of pieces. However all news sources are not created equal, many
sources have a clear and direct political opinion that will most likely
influence the material they put on display. Depending on who is in control of
the political party is dependent on what news will be seen or generated.
Currently with Donald Trump in office it is highly anticipated that the news
negatively picking at his every action will be more liberal leaning while news
that inaccurately displays his successes will be more conservatively based.
With Trump being such a polarizing character in politics he is talked about on
most news sources I looked at regardless of political leanings, but again what
is most recognized in differences across party lines is the content that is
being displayed.
The more
liberal left wing media source I used to seek out a news story from was
Buzzfeed. This website is your typical trash news outlet that is more used for
entertainment, but you also may be able to come to some semblance of
understanding on a specific issue. The story on Buzzfeed was talking about the
New England Patriot’s recent trip to the White House, but the greater emphasis
was put on how starting quarterback Tom Brady was not in attendance. The story discussed
that Brady was Trump’s favorite player
and good friend, which was attacked by Buzzfeed as to why he would be a
no show if they were ‘buds’. Brady told the media he had a family commitment he
needed to be in attendance for but this news article jumped to conclusions and
depicted that the reasoning was due to Brady’s lack of support for the 45th
US president.
The more
extremist conservative news outlet story I got was from the infamous train
wreck that is Breitbart news. Breitbart is known for intolerant right winged
rhetoric that usually speaks little to no truth. The story I saw was about how
the US president Donald Trump and his chief strategist Steve Bannon made Time
magazine’s top 100 most influential people. This is a typical fluff piece that
is put on Breitbart in order to make Trump and his administration look good
among the public. The story shares how much of an honor this is and how he is
the one to change the status quo in DC like no other president has done before
him.
The news
outlet that I chose to gather a news story with the least amount of bias was
from the Wall Street Journal. The news article found was discussing how Trump
just signed legislation to extend a private care program for veterans. This
story was very direct in displaying the facts with as little frill as possible.
I also noticed that veteran care is a bipartisan issue that most if not all
Americans fully support.
From what
I can tell, the media is setting the agenda and generating the news. Trump does
not most likely particularly care that a member of the Patriot’s team did not attend
on a visit to the White House. The media wants to portray the president and his
administration in a light that is most beneficial to them gaining greater
viewership from assessing the ideologies of their followers. The media has such
a strong influence on what people think that it is to their benefit to set the
agenda and put across material that reflects the position and direction of the
news outlets intended purpose. The public is also very concerned with political
image and news pieces that are more entertainment based so that really reflects
in the framing of news and what is showed and what isn’t. Not all news stories
can have prominent attention because of the large amount of news that is
generated daily, so with the US being a public that is generally concerned with
issues not as hard hitting it is common to see a many stories that deserve
attention not get it. If I were advertising Trump I would of course want the
pieces like Breitbart where it shows that Trump does no evil because it would
help his tarnished image as a candidate and show his potential as a candidate.
However showing this news would only be done to cover up the stories I would
not want shared about Trump, which would not be a fair or an honest representation
to the naïve and sometimes-gullible public.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/davidmack/patriots-white-house-visit?utm_term=.xiBR1RVvK#.jcpgzgXZD
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-signs-legislation-extending-private-care-program-for-veterans-1492644471
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/20/donald-trump-steve-bannon-among-times-top-100-most-influential/




I definitely agree that the news is where people get the majority of their information from. Because of this, the media can tell the public what to think about and all too often the public doesnt worry about looking at all sides of a story. In the case of bias news outlets readers get a skewed sense of the truth.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with your assessment on the fact that you think the news outlets are generating the stories and they are not coming from the Trump administration. Clearly the news outlets are being opinionated and biased when it comes to politics in this election cycle. In my opinion if you look at the News outlets journalists and reporters political views you know what kind of news you will be getting i.e. liberal or conservative.
ReplyDelete