Donald Trump’s use of social media
was unlike anything the public was used to during a presidential campaign. He
used social media as a soapbox to rile up his followers as well as give those
who did not support him something to talk about.
During the election Donald Trump
had a campaign website, a Facebook, and an extremely active Twitter account. Donald did a really good job of making him and
his platform easily accessible regardless of the content he decided to
distribute. He had email lists, text messages sent out, and his website had
tons of information on his mission as a candidate. In regards to his social
media sites such as Facebook and Twitter it was extremely prevalent that these
platforms were most likely regulated by him and only him. His Facebook and more
so his Twitter account was off the cusp and lacking in formal tone.
Some things that were positively
seen in Trump’s social media usage were his ability to get strong reactions
from the public and his relatable and informal tone. His tweets were largely
talked about during the election, he would post emotionally charged accusations
that riled up the nation all within only 140 characters. The tweets that
produced the most attention were outlandish and in most cases boldfaced
accusations. The public, whether in support or against his candidacy, paid
attention to what Trump tweeted. He tweets magnetized all party followers just
because of the sheer entertainment, which helped him dominate the conversation
during the political season. Trump lacked a formal tone especially for a
candidate for the presidency, but I think this actually worked to his
advantage. By producing tweets that used words and phrases that were more
common he was able to attract a voting block of the population because they
understood and comprehended the arguments he made
When researching Donald Trump’s
media I stumbled across a page, citizensfortrump.com. This page was created
entirely by concerned citizens as a grassroots movement to elect Trump as the
45th president. They refer to the need to create a ‘volunteer army’,
which personally caused some concern in the verbiage they used. There are also
many other pages and Facebook groups showing support for Donald. The campaign
did not put out the citizens for Trump page or any of the other pages for that
matter, but it was somewhat effective in gaining and attracting support for
Trump, some of the group pages had hundreds of thousands of followers.
Things that could have been more
effective for Trump to do on social media were he could have been more formal
and less accusatory. Doing these things did attract a certain type of voter,
but it also took away from his legitimacy as a candidate. He was represented as
a candidate that didn’t care for others and as someone who was aggressively
rude. He tweeted about Meryl Streep being a terrible actress because she
criticized and undermined him, this was not an appropriate action taken by the
president. He should have also checked his sources and facts before posting, he expounds rhetoric of the media putting out fake news but in reality he does the same by jumping to conclusion and posting it for all of his followers to see. As a presidential candidate I held him to higher standards to accurately report happenings and that was not the case.
Social media is something that has been slowly making more of an appearance as a relied upon source for constituents during elections. Social media has been expanding and will continue to do so. The way candidates utilize social media will be an integral piece of their campaign. Social media presence catapulted the attention Trump received from the media and he used this platform to his advantage in the 2016 presidential election. He set the pace and molded what citizens expectations are for candidates on social media. Trump forever changed future political races and went against the normalized grain which caused his success.




I really like how you talk about the effects of his tweets upon the voter populace. Do you think if Trump had remained much more formal and less controversial that would have helped him in the election or hurt him? Honestly its anyones guess personally I would think it would have hurt him. Even people enraged by his comments became unaware free marketing people. Every time they posted or shared one of his tweets or Facebook posts just to discuss how angry they were Trumps message instantly reached more people who may or may not agree with his policies, that doesn't matter, what matters is his message continued to spread.
ReplyDeleteI thought it was really interesting when you talked about the "volunteer army" I had never heard of that plus i wasnt too sure Trump was even on Facebook a lot so i guess this really opened my eyes to other things going on and i also really liked how you spoke on the affect of his tweets.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed your second to last paragraph where you address the professionalism, or lack thereof, of Trump's social medias. I agree that his social media presence did attract some voters, but more importantly it hurt his legitimacy in the eyes of others. Tweeting and insulting an actress because they do not support your political views is certainly something a president should avoid doing. He definitely jumps to conclusions and that makes his posts hard to take seriously.
ReplyDelete