Donald Trump was assumed to have
more weaknesses than strengths as a potential presidential candidate, but since
his recent success of becoming the president of the United States it seems a
reevaluation needs to be considered.
The strengths became clear when he
won the election, the American people were intrigued and genuinely interested
in an outsider candidate. He was not a politician and with the approval ratings
for those in Washington so low it is understandable how his lack of time spent
in the political system was deemed as positive. Another strength after further
analyzation was his use of social media, he was so off the cusp and most times
blatant in his expressions. His social media did not have the greatest
connotation, but he was so unlike other candidates that his negative use of
social media created more media attention thus putting more attention on him as
a candidate and creating more name recognition for him at the polls.
His weaknesses as a candidate were
also seen as some of his strengths. Him as an outsider candidate was appealing,
but it also called into question whether he was the right candidate for the job.
Some people questioned his knowledge of politics and how he would be too
reactionary in the intricate political system of interpersonal relationships. Another
weakness in his campaign was the scandal involving his as he calls it ‘locker
room talk’. His character was slain and tarnished more than it had been
previously. He was not known throughout his campaign as an upstanding man, but
this incident for many people tipped the scale on his support. His campaign
tried to lessen the value of this incident and push the idea that because he
was an outsider candidate he has a past like any other human.
An opportunity that was noticed
throughout the campaign was the scandal involving Hilary Clinton and her
emails. This was apparent in the attack ads that the Trump campaign used to
exploit her actions. The attack ads called into question her character and her
ability to loyally and lawfully lead a nation.
A threat to the Trump campaign was
that Clinton was a woman. The first female presidential candidate took many
peoples attention. In many of her speeches there were a lot of phrases and
words used to empower women, she expressed the oppressions woman experience and
tried to become relatable to the majority of the country because of the female
identity she shared.
It should also be emphasized and
also made apparent that all of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and
threats could be seen differently depending on who is in the discussion.
The issues I believe Trump
showcased were immigration and economic stability. He spoke so much of his
campaign about the wall, and you better believe that Mexico is going to pay for
it according to him. Immigration regulation is something that is important to
the American public and took advantage of that by making it a focal point of
his campaign. He also tried to tie in his success as a businessman and give
face to him being able to regulate and control the US’s fiscal economy. I
believe that the education issue should have been addressed more, that is an
issue that affects all Americans whether they have children in the system or
they themselves are in the system. This issue is what I see as something that
could have given him more legitimacy as a candidate and appealed to more
moderate voters.
The key players that gave the
Trump campaign the success it had was Kellyanne Conway campaign manager, Daniel
Scavino director of social media, and Barry Bennett strategist. These people I
feel really aided him in embodying how he wanted the American people to view
him. Kellyanne has worked on campaigns for many elected officials in office.
Something that has been noticed is that Kellyanne is very good at avoiding the
answer to questions and diverting attention away from what the media wants to
know which was used to Trump’s advantage. Daniel has worked with Coca-Cola and
the Trump organization in previous experiences and Barry has worked on many
successful campaigns for US politicians. It can be assumed that Barry and
Daniel worked together on many issues. The way you portray yourself on social
media is a strategy in itself. These men were most likely, from the perception
of how the campaign went, the most utilized positions on the campaign trail.
They were integral to the campaign because social media and how Trump handled
situations that arose was some of the more appealing factors that gained
widespread attention.
Trumps campaign was unlike any other campaign that was
ever seen, and is something that went against the grain of what most campaign
guidelines are. Its success was unforeseeable and underestimated.
https://ballotpedia.org/Donald_Trump_presidential_campaign_key_staff_and_advisors,_2016
http://www.newsday.com/news/nation/donald-trump-reveals-stances-on-key-issues-1.12656447



Sara,I really thought the way you covered the campaign was well done. It seemed that every angle was covered. The inclusion of the multimedia was a great touch. I do think that in terms of social media director, Daniel Scavino, did not necessarily had much influence on what was tweeted because some of those tweets aren't necessarily what I would think a presidential candidate would want to have people screenshot for future reference. Overall well done.
ReplyDeleteI liked the way you formatted this blog post and I got a kick out of the background of twenty dollar bills that you provided for your blog. Something that I'm sure was mentioned in other blog posts but I did not see on the posts I read is Trumps ability to appeal as an "outsider" in politics. This was a huge strength for Trump down the stretch of his campaign and arguably a big reason why he won. Other than that I thought you did a great job Sara.
ReplyDelete